Sign in Subscribe

Home Argument Route

The Human Confusion

Reader. Moral psychology, literature, social theory, "why humans keep screwing this up" readers.

Argument. Human moral language is a compression layer. It tracks some real things but repeatedly mistakes legibility, blame, intention, narrative, loyalty, procedure, and symbolic reassurance for moral reality.

This route teaches Modal Path Ethics by showing why ordinary moral cognition is not false, but late, compressed, and structurally unreliable.

The route, in order

  1. Story-Minds
  2. Legibility: Not a Criterion of Moral Depth
  3. Secondary Morals
  4. The Buddhist Path vs. Modal Path Ethics
  5. About MacIntyre
  6. Why Habermas Must Be Discussed Next
  7. Heidegger, Sorge, and Care
  8. Our Debt to Bernard Williams
  9. Gilles Deleuze and Modal Path Ethics
  10. Applied Case: The Batman
  11. Applied Case: Fresh (1994)
  12. Applied Case: The Law
  13. Applied Case: The Democratic Process
  14. Applied Case: The Languages
  15. Applied Case: The American Corrigibility Crisis
  16. Applied Case: The Darien Scheme
  17. Applied Case: HBO's Chernobyl
  18. Applied Case: The Missing Link
  19. Mirror Match: The Modal Path Ethics

The five keystone moves

Every route is built so the reader is forced through these five structural moves.

  1. Harm. Harm is contraction, not just suffering, blame, rights-violation, or bad feeling.
  2. Bearer. The bearer is an extant locus, not necessarily a person.
  3. Reach. Reachability matters more than abstract possibility.
  4. Weight. Weighting prevents flat optionality. Not every lost branch matters equally.
  5. Resistance. Resistance and burden transfer explain hidden harm before final closure.