Home Argument Route
The Formal Spine
Reader. Philosophers, skeptics, people who want the clean theory first.
Argument. Modal Path Ethics is not a vibe, politics, utilitarianism, capability theory, person-affecting ethics, or metaphor. It is a path-structural account of harm, good, better, loci, weighting, resistance, and commensurability.
This is the cleanest "teach the framework alone" path.
The route, in order
- Formal: Contraction Is Harm
- Legibility: Not a Criterion of Moral Depth
- Secondary Morals
- Formal: Weighted Reachable Future Space
- Why Better is Not the Greater Good
- Modal Path Ethics Is Not Partisan Politics
- Formal: What Makes Something a Locus
- What Is Not an Extant Locus
- Taxonomy of Extant Loci
- Formal: Resistance and Harm
- Commensurability
- Capabilities & Obligations
- Speed Critical Scenarios
- The Narrow Path Ahead
- Mirror Match: The Modal Path Ethics
The five keystone moves
Every route is built so the reader is forced through these five structural moves.
- Harm. Harm is contraction, not just suffering, blame, rights-violation, or bad feeling.
- Bearer. The bearer is an extant locus, not necessarily a person.
- Reach. Reachability matters more than abstract possibility.
- Weight. Weighting prevents flat optionality. Not every lost branch matters equally.
- Resistance. Resistance and burden transfer explain hidden harm before final closure.